GC Compliance · EMT & RMS

EMT models and grid-code compliance for GB connections.

For generators, inverter manufacturers and developers connecting in Great Britain. We build the validated models and produce the compliance evidence the connection now legally requires.

≥ 1 MWEMT model now mandated
PC.A.9GB Grid Code basis
EMT + RMSBoth domains delivered
3 studiesFRT, FFCI and SSO in one package
Why this matters now

In GB, an EMT model is no longer optional.

Under the GB Grid Code (PC.A.9, brought in by GC0141), new generators and inverter-based plant above the small-power threshold must supply a validated three-phase EMT model and show compliance before they can energise. NESO can ask existing owners too. For converter plant that means proving ride-through, fast fault current and no subsynchronous oscillation, not just steady state.

Validated EMT modelThree-phase, ≤10 µs step, self-initialising, with V&V report
Fault ride-throughThe ECP.A.3.5.1 voltage-dip cases, demonstrated and plotted
Fast fault current injectionReactive current measured and plotted at the point of connection
SSO screeningImpedance scan and eigenvalue stability from 1 to 500 Hz
Fault ride-through & FFCI

Stay connected through the dip, and support the grid.

The GB Grid Code requires plant to ride through voltage dips along a defined envelope and inject fast fault current while it does. We set up the ECP.A.3.5.1 dip cases in EMT, demonstrate the plant stays above the boundary, and plot the reactive current delivered at the point of connection. That is the evidence the connection review needs.

Low-voltage ride-through · balanced dip · 140 ms
The terminal voltage stays above the grid-code envelope and recovers cleanly, while fast fault current injection supports the grid during the dip. A marginal tune (toggle it on) drops below the boundary, which is a fail we catch before submission.
SSO screening

Catch the oscillation before the grid does.

Subsynchronous oscillation is the risk a 50 Hz study never shows. We scan the plant's dq impedance across frequency, flag every band where its real part turns negative, and check the stability of plant and grid together.

Plant impedance scan · 1–500 Hz
A control-mode resonance sits near 70 Hz. The negative-resistance band below 100 Hz is where converter and grid interaction has to be screened, then confirmed stable with an eigenvalue Nyquist check.
Proof

We did exactly this on a real 40 MW battery: a full impedance scan, eigenvalue Nyquist and time-domain injection, all stable across the band.

How we get you compliant

From model to approval, in four steps.

01

Build / audit the model

We build your EMT and RMS models, or audit and fix a vendor model, to the structure the checklist asks for, with encrypted blocks documented.

02

Run the mandated studies

Fault ride-through, FFCI, voltage injection, reactive capability and frequency response, with each case set up and plotted for review.

03

SSO screening

Active impedance scan and eigenvalue stability across 1–500 Hz, corroborated by time-domain injection.

04

Validate & submit

Model verification and validation reports, cross-referenced to factory, type-test and on-site results, packaged for the operator.

Why Velon

We work for the generator, the inverter manufacturer and the developer, the people who have to deliver the model. The same team builds it, studies it and signs off the evidence.

GB Grid Code · PC.A.9 GC0141 · EMT models ECP.A.3.5.1 · FRT FFCI ECP.A.3.7 · frequency response ENTSO-E NC RfG IEEE 2800

Need EMT models or compliance studies?